一本道无码

一本道无码
The Word

Student Handbook

Appeals of Academic Responsibility Panel Decisions

A student may appeal a decision delivered by the vice provost for education or designee following the Academic Responsibility Panel process by submitting a request for appeal in writing via email to the provost of the university within seven calendar days of the official notification of the decision.

In cases in which the Academic Responsibility Panel decision pertains to an appeal of course-level action, the course instructor may submit a request for appeal in writing to the provost of the university within seven calendar days of the official notification of the decision. In cases in which the Academic Responsibility Panel decision pertains to matters that involve multiple violation reports or requests for additional outcomes, the course instructor and/or student’s department head or designee may submit a request for appeal in writing to the provost of the university within seven calendar days of the official notification of the decision.

The written appeal request should indicate whether the appeal concerns the finding(s) of responsibility, the outcome(s), or both, as well as the basis for the appeal itself. The basis of an appeal will be limited to one or more of the following cases:

  • A gross error in procedural process that materially affected the outcome;
  • The outcomes imposed during the second-level review were not commensurate with the violation(s) of the University Policy on Academic Integrity for which the student was found responsible;
  • Inconsistency between the available evidence and the finding(s) of responsibility in the course-level action appeal review or meeting review;
  • New information, which was not reasonably available at the time of the proceeding, merits re-consideration of the final disposition.

The appeal officer designated by the provost will review the written appeal request and determine whether, in the judgment of the appeal officer, the appeal presents an appealable issue that warrants review by the appeal officer. In reviewing an appeal, the appeal officer, at their discretion, may meet with individuals and review information relevant to the basis of the appeal.

In the event of an appeal, outcomes will normally be held in abeyance pending the outcome of the appeal. In the event of an appeal at the end of a semester that affects recording of a course grade, an incomplete grade will be assigned pending the outcome of the appeal process.

Appeals will be decided by the appeal officer in a timely manner as circumstances warrant. While an appeal is under review, the appeal officer will update the student, course instructor, and department head as necessary about the anticipated timeline.

The appeal officer may consult with others as needed durig review of the case.

The appeal officer has the authority to accept, vacate or modify the decision as they deem appropriate for resolution of the matter being appealed. The appeal officer may reconvene the initial Academic Responsibility Panel or remand the matter to a new Academic Responsibility Panel for review.

Back to Academic Integrity Actions